Here I am writing to a client explaining which technology is the best. The end use is a one table, muliti-report application. Perhaps a few tables with selection lists, but the main data is in one table. The 2nd phase adds 2 more tables. This company is not a Windows shop, but has no Macs or iOS devices per-se. All the desktops are for Windows.
An executive summary is that if you want to do a corporate application that is the most flexible and might have complicated interrelationships then the non-all-in-one approach is the best solution using one tool for the data storage (the database or dB), another to make the input screens (ASPX, .net, php, html) and another for reporting like reporting services or even MS Access – it is good for that but only that. This requires having the resources and time to get this completed. A hybrid approach is always an option as the tools discussed in this article do interact with each other.
If you want to get going, make large even mid-complex databases and get your work done fast and easy and have many reports that are very quick to develop by even the most basic database designers or business people – Filemaker wins hands down.
Again, if you feel you need to grow, a hybrid system would work best. There are not lots of us who know so many technologies though, and it limits things to more advanced or experienced people – hence the cost might increase.
Rarely should one use MS Access even if it is already installed and tempting you to click on it on your start bar. Continue reading